Jimmy Akin has a clarification on the Potter article that I posted yesterday. Seems not only were the arguments stale, but it was only half the story. The other half? Writers in Vatican newspaper debate lessons of Harry Potter novels
Ahh, the ills of trying to skew the data. Hence the reason I stay out of it (for the most part.) I don't like the books, but it is about useless to go off on a tangent based on someone else's biased review.
Ahh, the ills of trying to skew the data. Hence the reason I stay out of it (for the most part.) I don't like the books, but it is about useless to go off on a tangent based on someone else's biased review.
No comments:
Post a Comment